A debate rages about the future role of the intranet - and how much to spend on it. What if I told you that we already have a global intranet? A place where people participate at their own pace, as far as they are comfortable, without being coerced or shamed into doing so?Here is why G Suite is our intranet, and why we should use it to build the best portals ever.
Note: Everything on this blog is opinion, but this time especially so. See this post as a conversation starter.
The main reason for adopting an intranet is to have a place to publish content instead of spamming people's inboxes. Intranets are typically curated by a team of knowledge management experts and corporate communications who fight a daily battle between the interesting and the necessary. When those battles are lost (usually due to pressure to publish content that somebody feels should have an audience), the newsletters come back. Only this time, the newsletters link to the intranet.
After a while, all that authoritative content builds up into an authoritative corpus. Much of it should go the way of the dodo, but HR policies, best practices, useful links etc. form a helpful springboard into the maze that every company above a certain size becomes. So helpful, in fact, that this collection of links becomes the intranet - it may literally become "the place where the bookmarks are, and it also has some news".
In an ideal world, intranets would be places of interactivity. Everybody loves feedback, and when you publish something, likes and positive comments are helpful and keep you going (your's truly is not an exception).
In my opinion, interactivity is a pseudo-argument. As every instagram user will tell you, 10% of visitors like content, and 10% of likes are accompanied by a comment. The statistics I observe would call such numbers hopelessly optimistic. Intranets are not social media. Even like buttons, if unclicked, can quickly become a statement you would not want below your content. The quality of comments would be a different topic entirely. Not because something can be done, it must be done.
There's a lot of money to be made with intranets (commercial intranets just won't go away). But the market appears to stagnate at best - it's been a while since I heard somebody talk about the "intranet killer app", as compared to productivity suits or instant messaging. Same for corporate social media, by the way. And why is Google not adding an intranet product to G Suite? Because they already have.
Over the last year, it became clear that our G Suite installation already is the biggest intranet we have ever had. It's just different: It's a body of knowledge created by every single person at your company, growing by collaborating, becoming updated or obsolete or going into curated archives as the content requires, without central control. That's what intranet architects have always dreamed about.
It may just need you to give it a nudge, or two:
If you haven't already, adopt Sites for everybody. Teach them how to build great sites. Do not fall into the trap of making Sites available for a chosen few, it is meant for individuals (it's much easier to create a great site for a proposal than to create a slide deck), small teams and, yes, intranets. But for that it must be used and accepted first. You will not lose by adopting Sites, much to the contrary. Sites makes Drive better.
If you haven't already, adopt Google Currents (formerly G+). As with Sites, you stand only to gain from Currents, and it will be a key piece in your delivery strategy for curated content. Currents makes working together better.
Advertise Cloud Search. This blog has been vocal about Cloud Search - it's the search function for our super intranet together. Cloud Search indexes Sites (not Currents at this point) so it will become even more important.
Each of these three bullets are big transformation projects in their own right that will yield you immediate benefits, because they improve your existing investments into G Suite. They're also free to use.
Get your strategy right. Is a portal right for you? Would you better be served by LOS portals? Should HR have its own portal? This is an opportunity to reorganize knowledge management and communications in your company, and to get it right by leveraging something people already know and use.
Consider what you have. I question the value of migrating content from portals - the benefit is small, old content will fit awkwardly (if at all) into the new environment and there can be so much manual rework that the few relevant bits of content could have been recreated faster by hand. If your HR policies and announcements are already on Drive, integrating them will take minutes, not months. Finally, consider that migration is often an excuse for inaction - it's hugely expensive and impossible to start small, so there's a risk of not ever getting started.
Empower a great team. Selecting a great team (that will stick around) and building a Site is the fun part. But that team needs to be empowered - by giving them authority and requiring essential communication to be available on the portal only (no newsletters!). Share responsibility for maintaining the site. Build feedback mechanisms. And include oddballs on the team who make sure the site doesn't become boring by listening to your community.
With all the money you saved from NOT buying yet another isolated intranet solution, you're bound to create something great.
I hope to have given you some ideas about what is possible when we string together all the technology at our disposal. There is so much value to be unlocked - amazing, engaging portals will be the next valuable addition to emerge out of our ecosystem. Thank you for reading!