Will we ever stop typing
The case for typing less
The case for typing less
Last week's post about predictive typing concluded that our immediate future holds less typing - at least, less of the repetitive typing. How could that be bad!
It stopped short of going the long haul, and that's what we're here for! So, will we type in the future?
Software highlights or corrects your typos after you have typed them. It might even correct grammar. While assistive, software only looks behind.
It gets interesting! Software starts looking ahead, autocompleting your words as you type them, suggesting next words or offering whole snippets.
Entire texts, based on your style and what the conversation is about. You wouldn't have to proofread, but maybe add something. Or it could offer to rephrase passages to make them more serious/urgent/funnier.
The system conducts entire conversations on your behalf - mainly with other systems. You could listen, get a summary or fully take over the wheel.
We've been at level 1 since the 90s, ushered in by Microsoft Word. Google Docs now has text and (soon) grammar correction too, but on a different level - like all Google products, it tries to understand what you are doing. You will get corrections, but it also knows what you are writing about, so it can offer related documents and research. It knows who you are, and what organization you're in and the way that organization talks. You still have to type yourself though.
What really made smartphone typing bearable (and allowed removing the physical keyboard from Palm and Blackberry days) was predictive typing. As AI improves and predictive typing becomes more accepted, level 2 is popping up in Gmail and Chat as well. It's still a lot of typing, but with assistance you get through it easier.
To answer if handcrafted emails will become rare, we should think about what texts really need to be hand-written. Not all texts are of equal value and importance!
Transactional messages ("Ticket #123 is waiting for your reply", "Holger shared a file with you", "Your order has arrived") are already fully automated. Google tries its best to receive them in an automated fashion for you (bundling read receipts, processing sharing requests, putting time-based information on your calendar). Honestly, you should not even see these messages. They should not even be sent by email.
Routine messages ("Please don't forget to respond", "I'll be out tomorrow", "Please find our proposal") won't be missed too. Nobody likes typing these - great case for automation. G Suite is trying to make sending these messages easier (by suggesting full snippets) or by improving other services (Chat, Calendar, Docs) so that less back and forth is needed. These messages will likely be absorbed into these services entirely and live on as notifications, comments, tasks etc.
Update: The introduction of Dynamic Email will make those notifications more relevant in that you can interact with the apps behind the notifications from the comfort of your inbox. These are likely to stay around, but will become much more useful.
Personal messages - If it is personal, should it be on email? I understand business hours, time zones, vacations, packed calendars, yet I think other tools like rich instant messaging and good old conversations will squeeze out personal messages too.
Specialist texts (proposals, corporate communication, tutorials) will likely remain hand-crafted by professionals for a long time. Assisted, but handcrafted. G Suite easily covers the easier examples of this category (meeting minutes, spreadsheets, visualizations), but this goes beyond into the realm of graphic designers and type setters. Those professionals need specialist tools.
Google products that already write for you
Google Docs: Level 2 (Smart compose, summaries)
Gmail: Level 2 (Smart reply, smart compose)
Google Chat: Level 2 (Smart Reply, summaries)
ChatGPT: Level 3
One might argue that virtual assistants (like Google Assistant or expert systems like Google Duplex) leapfrog the whole "type for me" issue. Perhaps they really are the future! They can handle everything but specialist texts for most cases.
Thanks for reading! While knowledge workers need to stay connected (that makes us valuable), email is not the right tool for that. It causes overload and spamming problems, leading to an arms race of catching attention. Better tools are emerging, like the proper use of instant messaging and enterprise social networks.